The Repugnant Conclusion Institutet för Framtidsstudier

Swedish Collegium for Advanced Study SCAS Bibliography

Jesper Ryberg & Torbjèorn Tèannsjèo - 2004 Repugnance or Intransitivity: A Repugnant But Forced Choice. Why we Ought to Accept the Repugnant Conclusion-- T. Tannsjo. The Repugnant Conclusion and Worthwhile Living-- J. Ryberg. Postscript-- D. Parfit. Index of Names.

Tannsjo repugnant conclusion

Utilitas, 2002, vol. 14, issue 3, 339-359 . Abstract: Derek Parfit has famously pointed out that â€˜totalâ€™ utilitarian views, such as classical hedonistic utilitarianism, lead to the conclusion that, to each population of quite happy persons there corresponds a more extensive population with people living lives just The repugnant conclusion can be—and often is—presented as a challenge to classical utilitarianism. There are two basic responses available. The first strategy is to modify or abandon classical utilitarianism. Footnote 3The second strategy is to accept classical utilitarianism and with it the repugnant conclusion. The Repugnant Conclusion.

Free 2-day shipping. Buy Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy: The Repugnant Conclusion (Hardcover) at Walmart.com An Evaluation of Jesper Ryberg and Torbjörn Tännsjö’s Solutions to the Repugnant Conclusion. uu.se Uppsala universitets publikationer.

The Repugnant Conclusion Institutet för Framtidsstudier

Pris: 1699 kr. Häftad, 2010. Skickas inom 7-10 vardagar. Köp The Repugnant Conclusion av Jesper Ryberg, Torbjoern Tannsjoe på Bokus.com.

Punishment and Personal Responsibility - Yumpu

Anledningen till detta är en artikel, "Why we ought to accept the repugnant conclusion", Tännsjö är sedan 2002 Kristian Claëson-professor i praktisk filosofi vid Stockholms universitet.

Köp boken The Repugnant Conclusion hos oss! This world is better if the sum total of well-being is great enough, and it is great enough if only enough sentient beings inhabit it. This conclusion has been considered by Parfit and others to be ‘repugnant’. Ulf Torbjörn Harald Tännsjö is a Swedish professor of philosophy and public intellectual. He has held a chair in Practical Philosophy at Stockholm University since 2002 and he is Affiliated Professor of Medical Ethics at Karolinska Institute. Tännsjö was Associate Professor of Philosophy at Stockholm University from 1976 to 1993 and Research Fellow in Political Philosophy at the Swedish Research Council in the Humanities and Social Sciences between 1993 and 1995. Thereafter The Repugnant Conclusion Essays on Population Ethics.
Snitt arbetsdagar per ar

University essay from Uppsala universitet/Avdelningen för Tännsjö är sedan 2002 Kristian Claëson-professor i praktisk filosofi vid Stockholms universitet.

This may lead to counterintuitive or contradictory conclusions in certain cases.
Emmylou harris songs

peter senges five disciplines
matsal skolan
parkera stockholm app
lundsberg kända elever
forsakringskassan merkostnadsersattning
lena olin lasse hallström

Hedonistisk Utilitarism - Mimers Brunn

(Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2004); The Repugnant Conclusion. Essays The Repugnant Conclusion2017Ingår i: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ISSN 1095-5054, E-ISSN 1095-5054 Artikel i tidskrift Tännsjö, Torbjörn. av O Risberg · 2014 — Tännsjö är en av de få som försvarar totalprincipen och således fak- tiskt accepterar Ought to Accept the Repugnant Conclusion» (2002)1 beskriver han sina Neue Anstösse zur Reflexion eines umstrittenen Problems by Torbjörn Tännsjö The Repugnant Conclusion Essays on Population Ethics (Library of Ethics and ”Om Tännsjös försvar av den motbjudande slutsatsen” [On Tännsjö's Defence of the Repugnant Conclusion] (2014).

GÖTEBORGS UNIVERSIET Normativa argument mot - CORE

I denna genomgång av vård i Reflecting on these cases leads us to the conclusion that there is no 143 pages; författare: Torbjörn Tännsjö; Utgivare: Edinburgh University Press Tännsjö? Lyckligtvis har vi pdf-versioner på vår server på se.xiaotilstra.xyz.

Genetic Technology and Sport (red). (London and New York: Routledge, 2005) Global Democracy: The Case for a World Government. (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2008) Animal Ethics - A Crash Course. (Stockholm: Thales, 2010) The mere addition paradox, also known as the repugnant conclusion, is a problem in ethics, identified by Derek Parfit and discussed in his book Reasons and Persons (1984). The paradox identifies the mutual incompatibility of four intuitively compelling assertions about the relative value of populations.